55. Our Most Probable Beginnings

Our Most Probable Beginnings

( A rationalisation ).

 The Mediation of angelic Intelligences in Creation.

 This Article presupposes the existence of a self-subsistent, ultimate and absolute reality Who is a self-subsistent, living, intelligent, spiritual generator of ultimate, absolute living energy that is transfomable in all the known and yet unknown forms of energy  ( spiritual, biological, material, etc. etc. ) we, the intelligent beings in Creation are dependent on and subjected to.

 The three people of the Book( i.e., Hebrews, Christians and Mohammedans ) and a few others ( i.e., Buddhists, etc. ), believe in the existence of Angels, Demons being Angels who rebelled to God from pride, i.e., wishing to be like God, or superior to some other Angel or group of Angels.

 
Christians in particular believe in the existence of the human soul who is also a spiritual, intellectual substance.   Perhaps   there  is  a  way  that  a human  soul  and   an  Angel   are   similar,   except  that  a    human  soul   can  form   a    dedicated    link    with  a  human    body   becoming  a  human  person.  The   word  integrated    would  be  assuming   too   much  as  we   do  not  know   much  of   how   spirit and  matter   may  be  linked   together.   In  the  case  of  Jesus  of  Nazareth  we   the   Trinitarians    invoke  the   homeostatic   unity  in   Jesus   of    his   two  natures,   the  divine  and  the  human,   without  admixture........................etc.. 
An  Angel  cannot    do  this,   although   able   to    appear   as   a   human  being.   Christians  also believe in the existence of the Word, a spiritual being,  a  divine  person,   co-substantial with God   and  incarnated   in   the   Son  in  an   homeostatic  unity   with  his   human  nature,   as  the Holy Spirit.   Unlike    the   Moslems   and  the   Hebrews   who  make    bushes    and    asses   speak    for    God,    as   if   God  needed   a   human   or   animal   mouth   or   a  mouth   of   some    sort   (  Angels   only    use  these    or   anything   else  in   Creation  in  order    to   attract  and   focus   human   attention   onto  themselves  ),    we   believe   that  God   speaks   through   the    Word   who  is  a  spiritual  person,   co-substantial   with  the   Father  and  the   Spirit.     For   example's   sake,   if   God  needed   an   arm     without    the   mediation   of   an  Angel,   outside   the   supervision   of   the   Word  v( God's  Executive  in  Creation ),   God   would     generate   a   spiritual   person    called   The   Arm    who   would   do   everything    a  human   arm    can    do   in  a   divine    way.   However,   God   is  not   so   primitive    and  imperfect  or  impotent  or   limited  as   the  Moslems  and  Hebrews    believe  in  their     retrograde   thick   skulls,   that   God   needs  animals, bits  and   pieces  of    body  or   body's   functions    to    express    God.

God  is   Omnipotent   and    the   right    type   of   Christian   does    not   seek   to  limit   God,   while   remaining    within  the  realm  of  human  reason.

St.   Thomas   of   Aquina   was   in  fact   a  Master  of  Logic  and  an  interpreter   of    Aristotle,   who   first   among  the  post-Socratics  believed  in  the   worth  of   matter  and  reason,    in    alliance   with   spirit  and  soul.

So,   whenever  a  Moslem  or   a  Jew   insults   us  and   God    saying  that   we   say   that   God   is   many   gods,     they    are  drawing    fire  on  their   own   heads  as   we    do  not    say   such  a  thing   at  all,   however   humanly   failing   to   express   the   loftiness  of   the  issue   owing   to our   imperfect   power of    speech   and   thinking  that  is   syllogistic,  that   is..............sequential.   We  are   in  fact   all  slaves  of  the   syllogism,   even   our   Computers.

And   History  has   been  proving   just   this  oh    foolish   Wahabists   of   Mecca.

When   our   Scriptures   talk   about   Jesus   sitting  at  the   right   hand  of  the  Father    this   is  not  to  be   interpreted  literally.   Any   western   school-student   knows    this,  if   he/she  is   not  a    cleavage-    worshipper,  i.e.,  a  Pinocchio.

The   Holy   Trinity  can  only   be  inadequately  represented    by   Art,  as     neither   the  Father     nor  the   Son    nor  the   Holy  Spirit   have  a    human    body    but   are   spiritual  or  like  Jesus   who  has   also  a   glorified   body.  

The   Son  is   both   the   Word   and  the  man   Jesus  of   Nazareth   who  can    assume   at   will  an    ethereal,  visible,     glorified    human    appearance   outside   the   Holy  Trinity.

So,   what  are  you   waffling   about    foolish  Rabbis, Imams,  Meuzzins, Sheriffs, Khaliffs,  Ayatollahs,  etc.,   etc.?

We   know    what   we   say,   you    do  not   understand    what   we   say   because  of   your   malice   and   lust   for  independent,  undeserved   leadership  and  dominance,   the   sin   of   the  primordial   all-others-excluding   self-seeker,   the  idolater  of   exclusivity   and   preferential  preferment.

We also believe that the Word incarnated in the man Jesus of Nazareth who was born from Mary by the power of the Holy Spirit.    And   this    even   Mohammed   the  great    islamic   reformer    concurs    with.   I   am mentioning  all  these beliefs and Beings in order to show that the interactions between spirit and matter are severall and multifaceted in the church’s tradition. Those who choose to not accept these beliefs and refer to these as foolishness are the real fools since they cannot come up with anything to replace them except a Big Bang Theory which leaves one with a vast darkness, emptiness, void, etc. etc. a big arabic zero in short and a dozen or more boards full of formulae which only show an elephant like memory of a digital type ( the sort computers have ) without any substance or conclusion and the waste of billions of taxpayers’ dollars.      On the  other   hand,   Hebrews/Jews   have  remained  intellectually static,   a   religious   fossil,    anchored   to   Jehovah  the  Father and  Creator,  who  may  be  a  human  anscestor  of    Jesus    in   whom    also  the  Word   became  incarnated,     to   the   neglect  of   the  more  original   Holy  Spirit.   Similarly,   and   incompletely  so,  the   Mohammedans    have    embraced  the   Holy  Spirit   as   Allah,   neglecting    both  the  Father  and  Jesus   as   mediators   between  Spirit   and  humanity.   

Where is all the cleverness of that, hey? 

According to St.Thomas Aquina, known in the Middle Ages as Doctor Angelicus et Communis, Angels and Demons are in fact spiritual beings having purely intellectual substances ( See Summa Theologiae I, Treatise on the Angels. Questions 50-64). Angels can sin and incur all the range of guilts a human being can, when and if a human being in their care sins owing to their wrong counsel, or neglect of duty, while only being able to sin according to their own nature, according to affection, from envy and pride, that is not sensually.

An example particularly useful to what is going to follow,

Angels cannot actually marry a woman and procreate from her, however they can be overcome by the sin of pride and envy to desire to become like God, Who can do in principle anything God wishes to do for the purpose of doing good, and in a distorted attempt to emulate God may counsel a human being in their care to actually take possession of a woman, perhaps against some existing legal or moral impediment and to do similarly other sinful acts.   Angels  can   manipulate   nature   and  cause   a   woman  to  procreate   by   manipulating    scenarios  and  events.   Angels  can  be   behind   the  latest   feats   of   genetic  manipulations   as   spiritual  forces  manipulating   human  beings.    Although not induced to sin through any natural affection, they share in the guilt accruing from the sin of the human being for whom they are responsible. A Guardian Angel is in fact part of the structures of Grace God devotes   to   the enlightenment, prevention, support and supervision of every human being so privileged and endowed by God at Baptism.

According to St.Thomas, there is no limit to the number and specialisations of Angels God creates. As a matter of fact, in general, no two Angels are necessarily   the same.

 I remember a very important prayer to the Guardian Angel I was taught as a child which I am reproducing here slightly modified in order to help me and the reader to focus on what I am saying-:

"Angels of God who are the guardians of the living and the dead, enlighten, guard, support and supervise those who have been entrusted to you by the Heavenly Piety.    Amen!".

 God the Father and Creator also uses Angels in order to Create and to direct and supervise human beings from whom God wishes to obtain some specific performance.

An Angel or a group of these can act together as intellectual substances by becoming part of any created substance or creature in order to achieve some particular end, i.e., by directing and supervising the development of such a substance or creature in accordance to some preordained plan or purpose in accordance with a planned or preordained path of evolution.

I believe that, as shown by Science, God works in Creation through evolutionary paths, experimentally, through trials and errors, by creating prototypes, trying these and modifying, correcting, improving, etc. and rarely in a direct way, to achieve a final product. I believe with Sir Laurence Gardner that the Genesis section of our Hebrew Scriptures has been over simplified, manipulated by its redactors in between 800 and 600 BC, with regard to the appearance of Adam and Eve in relation to the occurrence of the Flood, the responsibility about and occurrence of Original Sin, if any such ever occurred at all, and has given a  false expectation about God’s creative powers and methods of creating. God does in fact not work in a direct and final way ( although God is Omnipotent and can theoretically do so), but in an experimental and gradual way in logical stages according to reason and scientific methodology.    

I shall attempt to speculate about the motives behind the hebrew manipulations of the Scriptures as mentioned by Sir Laurence Gardner in Genesis of the Holy Grail Kings and draw my own conclusions as to the effects of these manipulations in relation to present Christianity and to the political scenario of the western world and civilisation.

Most importantly, I believe Creation is a vast work fully involving all of God’s powers, which are infinite, in other words a vast work commensurate to God’s powers, dignity and greatness.

Creation is in fact not an accident ( i.e., a random event ) or a trivial game or a sporting engagement; it is mighty, difficult, serious, important work for God, according to a plan that requires experimentation, trials and errors, owing to it being commensurate to God’s powers, therefore engaging God to God’s infinite limits ( so to speak)!

This is so especially since human beings and Angels have been created with a free-will capable to oppose, resist and rebel against God, Who is aiming at infinite perfection.

This is amply demonstrated by the study of geological time, palaeontology, the appearance, evolution   and   above  all   and  most  importantly    the   extinctions  of   some   of  these  species, of the various species of hominoids and human beings. etc.. We are in fact told by what is visible of the geological strata of the earth that the earth’s crust has required at least 4,600 million years to reach the present condition and that changes of this are continuous, if in general deceivingly slow in comparison to the relative and comparative short span of a human being’s life.

The Big Bang itself which must have needed an organiser of the whole show and the generator of the initial spark, facts strangely glossed over by our brilliant human mnemonical-elephantoids with Doctorates, may have occurred from between 20 to 10 thousand millions years ago!

And remember that without a  Big Bang  no human being could appear either.

Just consider as an example the peculiar comment about God’s existence, made by Sir Laurence Gardner, who is supposed to be a vastly intelligent scientist, an expert in Quantum Mechanics and Physics, and the head of the Celtic Church, of the Templar organisation, etc. etc., at page 95 of his book Genesis of the Holy Grail Kings, where he suggests that the Anunnaki or Nephilim may exist on an unseen planet beyond Pluto’s orbit, or in an extra dimension of warped time, etc., and I quote-:

.....................................................................................................................................

and the origin of the Anunnaki must, for the time being, remain a matter of conjecture. In general terms, however, it is all rather less perplexing than the Judaeo-Christian concept of a single, unidentifiable entity who is perceived as having no source of origin whatever [God].

At page 64 of GHGK, Gardner makes a similar comment about the Angels as not having any spiritual or ethereal nature, however being able to benefit from some renewable gift of immortality assignable by an undefined or unspecified leader.

However even considering Gardner’s biased conclusions one cannot totally dismiss his concerns and information, as my own concerns, doubts and feelings of uneaseness have occurred during my theological studies of Genesis, long before reading Gardner..

Even our present specie of Homo sapiens sapiens sapiens ( most appropriately called by Gardner the Adamitic specie) is continuously evolving and a humble and honest study of the history of morality and ethics, made by somebody who is not a sycophant and a member of Homo pinocchius, the present stage of its development, may be pointing to a rapid degeneration and decadence of this specie, unless God intervenes again.

Who knows if, perhaps God’s plan is increasingly becoming to eventually blot us out as a failure, as God has done repeatedly in the past, and begin again with some new prototype?

 But let us go back to our beginnings.

 As I have mentioned in the first section of this Article, Geological, Climatic Scenarios & the Rise of Humankind, the first hominids (hominoids) began to appear in comparatively recent times, only 7 millions years ago, until the appearance at about 3.8 millions years ago of the Australopithecus species in its african( Afariensis) and asian variations ( Asiaticus or perhaps Java) who were allowed to evolve until either merged into the Cro-Magnon, estinguished or, and I am saying this only intuititvely, surviving in comparative purity in Papua New Guinea and the Australian Continent (i.e., the australian aborigenes).
The   appearance  of  the  Cro-Magnon,    in   circa   35,000 B.C.,   probably  of  the   'R'   Y-DNA   Haplogroup,   hence   a   genetically  very  late   mutation  of   the   biological   Adam   who   appeared   as  'A'     about   65,000   B.C.   on  the  northern   shores  of  Lake  Victoria  in  Africa,    is    itself  a  mystery  that may   point  to  human  survivors   of    a  previous   Global  Warming,   who   went   through  a   relatively   short   Glacial  Era,   the  last  one.   The  existence  of  the   Cro-Magnon  is   an  estblishee    fact   and   their  strong,  massive,  well   formed   skeletons   are   available   as  I  have  seen  two  specimen   in  the   Crypt  of   the   Church  of  St.  Ambrose  in  Milan-Italy.

One must not forget to mention, for completenes'  sake Homo abilis who appeared only 2 millions years ago, Homo erectus 1 million years ago, all either being absorbed by further prototypes or becoming extinct, like the case of the Neanderthal, whenever not genetically suitable or compatible with the existing plan. The Neanderthal is in fact a particular case we know about which appeared 70,000 years ago, which became extinct
(   to  be   continued )

54. About Idolatry.

About Idolatry.

This is the answer to a comment by Douga, in Post 61, below.

My noble Douga, I am overjoyed by your participation. I lost in the early afternoon an answer to both Tim and my beloved G.Y., somehow a fantastic comment that I could not possibly re-write as inspiration is never the same. On the other hand it also contained some of my borderline x-rated speculations which can be easily misunderstood and I am glad it did not go through.

Douga’s Comment-:

Hi Templar, I haven't read all these comments but did read your whole post

(rather long but a good read).

About that school, it is clear that because of the distance that it is from an Islamist community that they are trying to convert more people to their religion or slap the non- Islamic people in that area in the face with their religious beliefs.

But then you went on to accuse the Jews and Islamists of idolatry, maybe you should look at Catholicism with their bowing down to statues of the virgin and the rosary and all the other bullcrap that you Catholic's go on with. You ritualise communion and call a man 'Holy Father' disregarding the teachings of Jesus, but you consider yourselves Christian.

Regarding the subject of idolatry, this is of fundamental importance and no human being is totally free from some form of idolatry. Idolatry is anything that stands between anyone of us in our relationship with (God the Father, Jehovah, Jaweh ) and God.

Deuteronomy

5:7-:

You must never have any other gods against my face.

5:8-:

You must not make for yourself a carved image, any form like anything that is in the heavens above or that is on the earth underneath or that is in the waters under the earth.

5:9-:

You must not bow down to them or be led to serve them, because I Jehovah your God am a God exacting exclusive devotion.........................................................

Deuteronomy does not mention yet Jesus the Messiah and His controversial relationship to the Father. Jesus is in fact considered by some of us Christians also to be God, not “a God”, but God. The Gospels say Jesus and the Father are One. Jews and Moslems alike insist in calling us idolaters, since we figuratively claim that Jesus sits at the right-hand of the Father.

In Post 28 of my Google blog

http://wwwgensferreria.blogspot.com

I in fact explain the quite legitimate and acceptable way believers in the dogma of the Holy Trinity see the Oneness and Unity of the three spiritual beings who are the one and only Holy Spirit, pointing out at the unfair, even malicious anthropomorphical accusations of those ( including all jewish Rabbis and islamic Imams with their little hats, turbans and togas, etc., in their own way idolatrous paraphernalia ) who have remained behind in the knowledge of God’s knowledge’s increase resulting from the quantum-jump in human evolution at the time of Jesus descent on earth.

Of course this ideal insight cannot be represented, but it can be imagined by geniuses like Michelangelo, etc., but it is noble and grand and it enhances God's Omnipotence and Freedom while making God more accessible to humanity.

Tell me what Moslems or Jews imagine while praying to Allah or Jehovah, except the sounds of their ritualisations, recitations and incantations and formulations?

La', ila la', ilaa Allah.

Sh'maa, Israel, Yehwah Eloheinu, Jehwah Eihath.

Can the worship of God consist of words alone?

Of feelings? but how does a human being feel if not sensually and analogically?
The  sensual  is  the   door  to  all  knowledge  through   symbols  (   words  are   symbols   too  )  and   these  to  feelings.

Jesus of Nazareth is in fact an historical watershed which really separates a time BC from the one AD. In two thousand years one who is not blind or blinded by Shaitaan ( this applies to you people from Mt. Scopus or from Mecca ) has been witnessing a material, and spiritual evolution of the human species, the rate of increase of which far surpasses even the crescendo one sees in the 30,000 years BC, beginning from pre-Sumerian times and which has not only Semitic roots as the Holy Scriptures have been manipulated to make us believe.

Let us stop all their bullshit, for God’s sake and throw into their brazen, insensitive faces the centuries old scandal and obscenity of fratricidal wars in the Middle East. Do they believe more in the One God of Unity, Peace and Love or in the idolatries of their feuds, confrontations and dissensions, in the distinctions of their little hats, turbans, ghalabias and togas, some wearing black, others white, philacteries, circumcisions, halal and kosher nonsenses, etc. etc?

The christian understanding of God is to-day, for us christians, except for some who have not been trained and like to waffle, relying on the confusing list of verses taken out of context, fundamentally, as it must be, about the God of Oneness and Unity, at least much more so than in the case of Jews and Moslems.

In Post 28 I explain how the Oneness and Unity of the three purely spiritual beings, namely the Father, the Son and the Spirit must be understood, and become readly acceptable, strictly NOT UNTHROPOMORPHICALLY, as the artistic representations are bound to show. There is no way iin fact that a human artist can represent a spirit, except symbolically through the knowledge of our world of senses.

Yet it is surprising how anyone, even Douga, when one prays, how one sees God the Father one is addressing. We can only pray for the Gifts the Giver gives, and not know the Giver except through the Gifts, known through the world of senses. Knowledge, all human knowledge is sensual.

Come on, here I am waiting. Tell me.

Has anyone seen God except through HIS/HER/ITS gifts?

How does anyone then claim that one is indeed praying to Him/Her/IT and not to some idolatrous being or object among one’s desires, unless one is acknowledging the Giver of all?

Very important and fundamental question, Dear Watson, one which is at the heart of all Theology.

The prayer’s acting and being show the nature of the prayer’s God. Is the acting and being of Jews and Moslems in the World evidence of their worshipping the True , the One an Only God, or rather of Shaitaan?

A lusty arabic caravaneer can even see his beautiful  wife waiting for him back in the tent, confusing the gift with the Giver. Are we to condemn him if   she  has  been  God-given   to  him?

There are then idolatries and idolatries, which could be listed on an aristotelian list in accordance to an ethical value, on a prioritised basis or in accordance to how much the considered idolatry is affecting the relationship of the idolater with God. Aristotle is important and lack of knowledge makes the field of idolatries a plain, whereas there are priorities. Yes I love the ideal of Mary and of St. Mary Magdalene, and of course I love art works about them. It is insulting to an accuser ( I accept Douga as an inquirer though) to charge me with idolatrous worship of Mary and Magdalene. Yes there are many among Christians who do so but they are primitive people who cannot know better. What are we going to do, shoot them?

As an explanation, the highest attributes of God are Peace, Love and Unity. The worst, lowest, most damning idolatry is the one that rejects these attributes.

An idolatry like the one that says that the Qu’ran or the Old Testament cannot be interpreted in the light of the increased knowledge of God through the course of centuries, is therefore exceedingly damning too. We, the Gentiles have been flexible and open to God’s teachings through History. we are the true people of God as history is showing. The Gentiles originate from the Cro-Magnon human species which also benefited from by mixing with the adamitic one and as I shall show when I complete my modest Article about the Beginnings, manipulations of the Scriptures in Sumerian times ( oral tradition )have introduced some distortions which give Moslems and Jews false presuppositions and foster their unwarranted arrogance. Amen!

P.S. 1-: Talking about the Cro Magnon species, I wish to point out to whoever may be interested, before I die, that in Milan, Italy, when I was a boy of ten, the perfectly preserved skeletons of two men where exhibited in the crypt under the Main Altar of the Duomo, believed then to represent the remains of two saints or Martyrs. I believe one was called st.Pancratius. The skeletons had been found while digging the foundations of the Cathedral. They have now been identified as the skeletons of two Cro Magnon men. The Gentiles are descendents of this species which also mixed with the best of the Adamitic one.

I was impressed by the unbelieveable robustness, solidity and magnitude of their bones which I have always ascribed as I grew up, fundamentally to the lack of pollution of their times.

In 2004, I attempted to find out where these were now located without success. Maybe in St.Ambrose Church. The Italians are notorious absconders and manipulators of Truth.

P.S. 2-: On the subject of prayer I wish to present a Motto of a family of the De Ferrariis Clan, the Acciaiuoli, " Nescimus quid petamus Domine; Omnia pro meliora" tr." We do not know what to pray for, Lord; May all be for the Better" .

I have recently realised how this motto may be somehow arrogant and naive as a Christian should always acknowledge the fact that all human beings are sinners and that prayer should begin with a request for forgiveness. No one should feel justified in saying that one does not know what to ask for. The above motto should have been rather " Perdona nos peccata nostra, Domine; Omnia pro meliora" tr." Forgive 8us ouyr sins, Lord;May all be for the better". Tye criticised mootto was on a funerary monument and is indicative of how easy it is even for highly learned people to miss the fundamental issue in prayer.

53. The Truth about Moses' Identity.

THE EGYPTIAN CONNECTION.
( including Jacob, Joseph, Moses, Miryam, Aaaron
within the Genealogical Chart of
the 18th Pharaonic Dynasty ).
from pages 346, 347 of
Sir Laurence Gardner’s
“ Genesis of the Grail Kings ”,
with comments and evaluations
by Attilio Louis Ferreri,
Bachelor of Theology (UFT-Melbourne).

Notes-: Comments and Evaluations.

Note 1-: Mahalath ( or Nefru-sobek ), an egyptian princess of Royal blood, married Ishmael, the son of Hagar the egyptian slave of Abraham. Ishmael was the half-brother of Esau and Jacob, and as a widow of Ishmael, Mahalath married Esau, giving birth to Igrath, also of Royal blood, who became the second wife of Pharao Amenehmet IV (1797-1786 BC ), of the 17th dynasty, giving birth to daughters, including Zelekha and her sister the Dragon Queen, Sobeknefru or Sobekhkare, the latter becoming the wife of the last Pharao of the Sobek Dynasty, Amenehmet IV, son of the first wife Aat of Amenehmet III (1841-1797 BC ).
Note 2-: Aye (ca. 1352-1348 BC), the son of Yuya (Joseph ), became the first Am-ram ( see page 147, ‘ The Fire-Stone Project.’ in Sir Laurence Gardner’s “Lost Secrets of the Sacred Ark. ”). ‘Am-ram’ was a designation or title probably inherited by Aye from his father Joseph, as another name fo this designation became ‘ Joseph ha-Rama-Theo ’, phonetically corrupted to ‘ Joseph of Arimathea ’.
Note 3-: Smenkhare, the scriptural Aaron, married a second wife Elisheba, daughter of Aminadab or Amenhotep, son of Rama ( the Aram ) and of the latter’s marriage to Kiya-tasherit, daughter of MIRIAM, sister of Tutankhamun and had a son Eleazar who married the daughter of Nashon/Putiel, son of Aminadab. Hezrom was son of Pharez, who was illegitimately born from Judah and Tamar, however legitimated through his marriage to Barayah, a legitimate daughter of Judah.
David descends from Jesse, Obed, Boaz , who through Salmon, via Nashon/Putiel, originated from Aminadab, related through Elisheba, sister of Nashon/Putiel, to Aaaron back to the lines of Hezrom and Shelah, both sons of Judah, however intermarried with the lines of Moses ( through the marriage between Aminadab and Kiya-tasherit, daughter of Miriam ), related to the first Judge of Canaan, Othniel, from the line of Hezrom, to Bezaleel, the Master Craftsman ( who made the Sacred Ark), from the line of Caleb. Since Eleazar, born from the second marriage of Aaron to Elisheba married a daughter of Nashon/Putiel, and fathered Ahimaaz who was the first Zadok High Priest created by David, the Aaronic Priesthood of levitic origins and the Zadok one coincide.
So, both the Davidic Kingship, the Zadok High Priesthood and the Aram Craftsmanship
converge into the line of Jesus and James through the death without issue of John the Baptist.
Note 4-: The oppositions between Cain and Seth, between Esau and Jacob, between the precedence of Aten the Holy Spirit and Yehwah the Creator, are all resolved in Jesus of Nazareth.
However this coincidence has not been seen, understood and accepted by the Nations in the present world and various opposing alignments still linger on in opposition to the Holy Spirit which requires Peace and Good-Will between the members of human kind and between the latter and Creation.

Note 5-: Miriam is a very important biblical character mentioned in Exodus and Numbers, however diminished and obscured by the Hebrew Priesthood ( Yahwists ) of the post-Babylonian captivity, in ca. 538 BC. She is mentioned as the nameless sister of Moses in Exodus 2:7, as the sister of Aaron in Exodus 15:20 and in Numbers 26:59 as the sister of both Aaron and Moses. There is clearly something missing in the whole scriptural account of the origins of Moses, considering the magnitude, importance and influence of the biblical personality of Moses, which gives an impression and feeling someone is hiding something without an outright use of lies, uttering half-truths which can be excused as errors or ignorance, a practice similar to the later talmudic approach and attitude to morality and ethics, an attitude later on adopted by the Roman Catholic Canon Lawyers in support of Constantinianism, an attitude of expediency and plausability. The obscuration of the truth about Moses and Miriam has also been the result of the eradication of all records and inscriptions referring to all members of the 18th Dynasty by the last ruler of this Dynasty, an Egyptian general called Horemheb who became Pharao through marriage and one suspects, usurpation and intrigue, after the death of young Tutankhamun, whose existence was discovered through the accidental finding of his tomb. Please note that Akhenaten's tomb has never been found as he, if indeed Moses, was buried by the Israelites in the wilderness. Horemheb’s motivation was both a hatred of ATEN ( the Holy Spirit ), the God of All Unity and Oneness, and a seeking of popularity with the Egyptian, idolatrous, well-to-do classes. There is a much respected Book of Jasher known to biblical circles, which tells the truth and let me quote from “Genesis of the Grail Kings “ by Sir Laurence Gardner, who, although confused, unable to synthetise what he knows for our times, is an excellent guardian and narrator of the truth. I am quoting from pages 290-291-:
..................Outside the Bible, however, Miriam’s story is told at some length----particularly in the book of Jasher, a work not selected in the canonical Old Testament. It was not until after some time after the death of Jesus that the separate scriptures of the Jews were collated into a single volume and it was then that certain books were excluded because they were at variance with the compositional strategy. One of these was the book of Jasher-----a book so important to the earlier Hebrews tha it is still mentioned twice in the canonical Bible. The very fact that these references are to be found in Joshua 10:13 and 2 Samuel 1:18, indicates that Jasher was around before these books were written-----and they each claim that it was a repository of essential knowledge. But although not promoted by the mainstream establishment, Jasher has not been as historically secret as one might imagine. The 9-foot ( ca. 3 m) Hebrew scroll was a prize of the Court of Emperor Charlemagne ( AD 800-814 ), having been discovered in Persia [Iran] by the monk Alcuin, who later founded the University of Paris. As a reward for his discovery, Alcuin was awarded three abbeys and became England’s Archbishop of Canterbury.
In the fourteenth century, the British Reformer and Bible-translator John Wyckliffe(1320-1384 ) wrote “ I have read the book of Jasher twice over, and I much approve of it as a work of great antiquity ” . It is generally reckoned that Jasher’s position in the Bible should be between the books of Deuteronomy and Joshua, but it was sidestepped because it sheds a very different light on the sequence of events at Mount Horeb. In person, Jasher was the Egyptian-born son of Caleb; he was brother-in-law to the first israelite judge Othneil( Judges 1:13 ) and was the appointed royal staffbearer to Moses.............................
Unquote.
The Israelites/Hebrews knew the truth but became obsessed with their racial hubris about their exclusive position in Creation as the physical Chosen People of Jahweh.
There is a further question a discerning, thinking reader of the Scriptures should ask as to why Moses or his sons Gershom and Eliezer were excluded from the Priesthood in favour of Aaron, if Moses had indeed been a natural/uterine brother of Aaron, rather than a baby ( a half-Egyptian cousin ) nursed and fed by Aaaron’s natural mother Tey, who was a Jewish woman of Levite descent. Moses was not a descendant of Levi, although rightly called, according to custom, a son of Tey, in virtue of her having been his feeding-mother, and his only Jewishness was second-hand, from his own mother Tiye, Aaron's paternal aunt, the daughter of a Jewish father, Joseph the son of Jacob who had married the Egyptian daughter of Potifarre the Priest of Ra’, his original master when a slave in Egypt.
Note 6-: AMRAM, RAMA, ARAM, RAMTHA, IMRAN, HA-RAMA-THEO, ARIMATHEA and Jochebed or Tey, Mose’ feeding-mother ( to be written later).
CONCLUSION-: The manipulations and obscurations present in the Scriptures are inevitable owing to the number and diversity of writers and redactors, each seing scriptural events from different angles, at different times in history, with different theological understandings, interpretations of the past, without a complete knowledge of the events, with different goals and world-views, an inadequate, defective understanding of physical categories, like power, force, work, energy and the relations of these to time, requiring modern Physics to clarify. Most contributors meant well and what we have received is still a miracle of God’s Communication and Revelation achieved with such biased and flawed tools.
As I observed above, in spite of all the obscurations and manipulations tending to minimise all influences other than those of the Hebrews of Canaan, it is clear Jesus’ anscestors included all participants, among whom even sinners were included, to the scriptural events in Mesopotamia and the Middle East, which shows the Holy Spirit DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE and loves to rehabilitate sinners, as in the end, there is no one innocent in relation to God ( see St. Paul’s Romans ). In spite of the efforts of Judaism to maintain the worship of Yahweh strictly an Hebraic Monopoly, Christianity became a universal Religion. It is time for Christianity to set some order in the Scriptures’ Interpretations, further honouring the wisdom of, say, Galatians 3:28, achieving and presenting a united Religious Belief to all other religious people in the World, this not to dominate but so as to act as an example of the praxis of Christian Ideals.
I, by nature a synthetiser, cannot personally understand the malice of Jews and Moslems in rejecting Jesus as the Ultimate teacher when/once it can be shown how he descends from Juda through David, and that Jesus’ ancestors have also intermarried with most representatives of the ancestors of the Arabic people, and all Mesopotamic people in general.
A plausible explanation may be that Mohammed, while aiming at the eradication of animism and politheism among his people, chose a path of separation from and rebellion against both the Jews and the Christians, as a form of Protest, as a representative of the Arabic grievances against the monopolising attitudes of the Hebrews/Israelites who had made themselves into the Chosen People of Jahweh as a Race of the Human Species, to the exclusion of all other mesopotamic religious and cultural contributions, rather than as the Ideal of a Spiritual Race, membership of which all human beings can aspire to, in accordance to Galatians 3:28. If this is true, it is time now for Moslems and Jews to join the Christians whose Reformations have clarified and somehow exposed the Hebrews’ misunderstandings.
This is why, although the ancient obscurations and manipulations have not damaged our present understanding of the Holy Trinity, having only obscured the essentiality and independence of the Spirit, and of the fact that the WORD is the Spirit operative in time and creation, perhaps both in Jahweh *and Jesus, it is nevertheless important to correct these faults, perhaps by adding a few more Books to the present Canonical Scriptures together with the re-evaluation and, if needs be, the shelving of Dogmas.
This might require another Global Ecumenical Council to be convened.

* This would require theological research and evaluation as it is a totally novel insight of mine.
I mean that there is in my mind a possibility, that Jahweh may also, like Jesus, have been an homeostatic presence of the Word, as Spirit in Creating and Making, in a human being who may have been a human anscestor of both David and Jesus.

52. The Sung Quran.

THE SUNG Q'URAN AT LAST!
A choice of six different singers!
A fantastic piece of work!
( I am far from being sarcastic!)

1.
Holy Quran Portal online
Read & listen to Holy Quran online
Arabic, English, & Urdu text/audio
www.quranexplorer.com

51. An expansion of " The Perfect Prayer ".

Attention all you thinking ( non-brainwashed ),
Hebrews and Mohammedans-:
This invocation can help you understand why you have remained limited
in relation to the understanding of, respectively
the Yehwah of the Hebrews' Old Testament
and the Allah of the Mohammedans' Q'uran.
Consider, please, Genesis 1:1, 2.
and the fact that the Christian Gospels
are essential to a complete understanding
of both the Old Testament and of the Q'uran.
Allah ( pure Spirit or ruah elohim ), is of paramount importance, however needs mediation by someone more than mere human beings such as laypersons, Rabbis, Mohammed or Ministers, Pastors, Priests.
Funny hats, rituals, sacraments, memorisation of texts and prayers, do not help either, without a mediation from the Word, through the Father and the Son.
Even the Q'uran admits Jesus was conceived through the intervention of the Holy Spirit ( an Angel of Allah ).
Allah, rationally and logically operates in Generation, Creation and Making through the mediations of Jehovah and Jesus in virtue of their close associations with the WORD who is the only Being of the same spiritual nature as Allah ( generated not created or made ).
Jehovah is in fact the Elohim, whose holding of the Holy Spirit, as the Word, allowed Jehovah to Make humankind and to Sustain Creation-in-Time.
Respectfully speaking and thinking, a divine Mediator is required, as Allah's and Jehovah's powers cannot be approached by unmediated/unrepresented humankind.
Even Mohammed recognised the existence of Angels who operate and execute Allah's Will ( the WORD ) on behalf of Allah.
Could the greatest Being ( ATEN/ALLAH ) in the whole Cosmos be conceived to operate and execute with ITS own hands and receive messages personally ( un-mediated/unrepresented) being IT a pure SPIRIT and ITS invisible/hidden power being such that it destroys any ordinary living being approaching IT?
Can any life form survive meeting a Being whose power is greater than any nuclear explosion, whose spiritual power is infinite?
So, what is this self-delusion that one can pray to, communicate with Allah, who is a purely spiritual power, without the mediation or representation or advocation of a divine Being such as the WORD, who is Spirit in operation-in-Time, associated with
Yahweh-the-Father and Jesus-the-Son?
Please allow me to tell you, who are so self-deluded, your approach is both insulting and stupid and not to be tolerated to-day when understanding and knowledge have increased, written messages have been completed,
meant to be synthetised by the three peoples of the Books, LOVINGLY and in mutual respect, not in satanic bloodshed.
So, get the facts/truth correctly and stop killing one another for a lack of understanding, and scheming against us the West, oh misguided Jews and Islamists, before it gets too late.
Do you ever ask yourselves why you have lustily kept on killing one another for centuries and desiring to subdue all others in the name of your limited/defective understanding?
In fact, while we in the West have been changing and progressing, in spite of the corruption of many, you are still chained to an incomplete and unsatisfactory interpretation of God.
While saying this to you, I also admit the West is also in need of Ethical Reformation/Renewal and a re-evaluation of its Democratic Constitutions.
I am inviting both Jews and Islamists to work together with us in understanding and working for God.
Remember we are the three peoples of the Books.
If you refuse, your own blood is on your own heads.

Perfect Prayer of
Recognition in Invocation.

Hail Holy Spirit,
ATEN ( ALLAH ),
image-less, hidden, pure, restless, free,
ubiquitous, omnipresent,
outside Time,
un-mediatable by, un-involved with humankind
except-through
the Father and Jesus.

Hail Holy Spirit,
holder of all forms of Life,
Powers and Energies-in-Time,
through Time,
originator of Time,
Generator of the WORD,
who, as Spirit in action, operation, and creation
Created the heavens, earth and worlds.

Hail WORD,
who as spirit in operation,
are Yehwah ( Yahweh/Jehovah ),
Father and Maker of the human race,
and who, as spirit in operation,
are also Jesus the Nazarene,
Son and Mediator.

Haem.

Note-: Amen the ancient egyptian attribute of Aten, borrowed by the Israelites, does not mean ' So be it ' as Haem does so.

50. I Believe in God.

This prayer is a sequel to post 49-: Holy Spirit and is based on the Roman Catholic Creed, in a recognition of the primacy of the Spirit, which is not the same as predominance.
It arises from my concern for and a desire of the unity between the religions of the peoples of the Books, of whom Mohammed spoke of when in his good-willing and peaceful moments. I dedicate therefore this Prayer to Mohammed who loved Allah as Spirit, as the imageless and hidden God of the Egyptian Akhenaten, Pharao Amenhotep IV of the 18th dynasty, the father of Tutankhaten ( Tutankhamon ), who was related to the israelite Joseph.
I mean it to be and function as a general guideline and not to be in competition with or substitution to any existing prayer.
I remain while writing or praying it an Apostolic Roman Catholic, in and loyal to the Faith in which I have been born by God's will.
Its links to Judaism is to be through the agency of Yahweh ( the Elohim of Genesis 1:2, the ruah of whom is meant to be ATEN ) and to Mohammedanism through the agency of Aten the Holy Spirit ( ruah elohim) who I believe to be approached most closely by the mohammedan Allah. However, both Mohammedanism and Judaism are in my interpretation of Genesis, incomplete in so far as these exclude the mediation of the Word both in the Generation and Creation of humankind respectively through Aten and Yahweh
( in so far as both spirit and flesh constitute a human being. in an analogical way that both the Word and Adam constitute Jesus of Nazareth).
In my interpretion, Yahweh is a divine agent that could very well be the Word. There could be a possibility of a simplification of the whole scenario which would reduce to Aten and Jesus, since the Word incarnated in Jesus. However since the Incarnation does not mean miscegenation or mixture, one can still say there is-: Aten, Word ( Yahweh) and Jesus in a Trinitarian Unity and Oneness.

CREED.
I believe in ATEN
the Omnipotent God,
the Holy Spirit,
the origin of Power
for all Life, for all Energies
and for their transformations,
the generator of the Word
before time ever was.
I believe in Yahweh ( Jehovah),
the Creator, through the Word,
the maker of Heaven and Earth
and the Father of humankind.
I believe in Jesus of Nazareth,
the Word, generated as such by the Spirit,
made by the Father Yahweh in so far as a man,
born of the woman Mary,
through the agencies of the Word
and of Joseph of the Line of David.
I believe in the invisible, heavenly
Church of Melchizedeck,
to which all earthly, lawful churches are subjected,
their lawfulness being demonstrated
through the christian praxis of their members.
So it may be.

49. Holy Spirit.

Since reading Sir Laurence Gardner's
" Genesis of the Grail Kings ", see genealogical tables at pages 346, 347, where he claims Moses to have really been the son of Pharao Amenhotep III or Nubmaatre ( ca. 1405-1367 BC ) and of a half jewish mother, Tiye, ( herself half Egyptian and of the egyptian priestly caste, her father having been the scriptural Potifarre, the Priest of Ra' ), daughter of Joseph
( one of the sons of Jacob ) the Grand-Vizier of Upper and Lower Egypt ( i.e., Vice-Pharao), I have been meditating on the Holy Spirit of my Trinitarian Invocation which somehow, graphically if not theologically ( as the three persons of the Holy Trinity are to an educated Roman Catholic equal in power and distinct beings) subordinates a person of the Trinity to the preceding one, in the Invocation.
The invocation I am referring to is-: " In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost, so be it. ", which is in itself a prayer or declaration of belief/faith.
If Moses was Amenhotep IV, also known as Akhhenaten
( ca. 1367-1361 BC ), a Pharao of the 18th dynasty, in virtue of having married his fully royal half sister Nefertiti, as the matriarchal line of the Royal Succession required, then Moses must have been the same person who chose ATEN the hidden, imageless God of the Egyptians' monolatrial, divine pantheon, attempting to transform the egyptian monolatry into a monotheism like the one followed by the later Hebrew/Israelites of the post-Prophetic age, after the return from the Babylonian captivity ( say, ca. 538 BC).
As this attempt was far too early for the age in which Akhhenaten lived ( even the Hebrews and Israelites were still monolatrous ), he was forced into exhile by the egyptian leaders/priesthood, his cousin Aaaron ( the grand-son of Joseph born from an israelite woman of the priestly tribe of Levi ), becoming Pharao for a short period as Smenkhkare, when Tutankhamoun the son of Moses became Pharao, halas dying when still a young man, a relative through marriage taking over as Horemheb. Horemheb died without a heir, opening the succession to the Ramessides dynasty. Horemheb tried to become popular by denying the power of ATEN and erasing traces of the predecessors in the previous dynasty, even the name of Tutankhaten (Tutankhamoun ) himself, whose tomb was discovered accidentally. The tomb of queen Nefertiti is still being looked for. That of Amenhotep III has been located but no mummy could be found since, if he was indeed Moses, the latter's mummy is somewhere in the Negev desert ( and Myriam's too etc.).
Moses was unable to have even his Israelites keep faith to a monotheistic belief in ATEN and the hebraic monolatry that tended to cristallise the supreme deity in the creator-of-all Yahweh ( Jehovah ), predominated after the death of Myriam, who valiantly struggled for ATEN.
Myriam, was a half-Mitanni ( of the indo-european language ) princess, also called Kija, or Mery-khiba or Mery-amon, daughter of Gilukhipa, the Mitanni wife of Amenhotep III. As the name Mery-amon shows she had become a devotee of Amen or Aten ( i.e., the hidden, imageless God ).
Incidentally, our use in the liturgy of 'Amen ' is wrong as it does not mean 'so be it ' but ' hidden one ', ' Haem ' being the right egyptian word for the former expression.
Myriam had in fact objected to Moses' marriage to Zipporah, the daughter of the Lord Jethro of Midian, whose belief was in the hebraic, all exclusive, inflexible, archaic and utterly primordial and unbalanced Yahweh, which was probably a semi-divine Agent of the Holy Spirit, ATEN. Since then, as the result of Hebraic, Judaic, Arian, Subordinationist, Islamic ( the latter with a different mechanism from the previous ones altough with the same misguided motivations ), the Holy Spirit has been considered as an intrinsic possession of Yahweh, Allah, the Father/Creator and the Son, although Roman Catholicism has the right intuition, halas vitiated by the inevitable, graphic, wrongly implied subordination to the Father and the Son in the Liturgy, the Spirit being seen as a power emanating from the two. My claim is that the two have life and purpose from the Holy Spirit. Paradoxically enough the Islamic Allah is more acceptable as ATEN than is Yahweh, however the Spirit acts through Executives in Creation and Allah on ITS own is incomplete in the creation scenario. Therefore Mohammed and Islamism have either to go back to school and revise the Q'uran or clearly and unambiguously adopt the Catholic/Orthodox invocation as a point of departure of their theology.
I have great respect for the Jehovah Witnesses' good intentions and for their literal translation of the Scriptures which claims greater understanding, however, following these recent speculations/insights my re-reading of Genesis 1:1, 2 shows that one cannot translate the word "spirit" into " active force " and claim to remain literally true.
The New World Bible Translation-(revised 1984)-:
Genesis 1:1
In [ the] beginnings God created the heavens and the earth.
2.
Now the earth proved to be formless and waste and there was darkness upon the surface of [the] watery deep;
and God's active force was moving to and fro over the surface of waters.
......................................................................................
The Hebrew word translated as God's active force is
ruah elohim
that is, literally, god's breath.
It seems to me from my extended knowledge from modern physics which is itself also from God's circle of knowledge ( see Karl Rahner ) and therefore of/from God, that we are now able to make a use of a distinction between the concepts of force, work, power, time and entropy in the similar way to what J.L. Segundo does in his theological works.
A force can only be an effect or a secondary cause not a primary cause, the latter implying the existence of a prime mover or engine/executor and an engine requires fuel and fuel requires a self-renewing, self-sustaining source of energy which, in time, is called power.
I cannot make this too long, but intuitively, from our experiences with fuels which tell us of biologically-related fossil or renewable fuels, of similarly related radioactive, nuclear fuels to which even the sidereal nuclear events are related of transformations from mass into energy and vice-versa ( see Einstein ) and of entropic degenerations and degradations of energy, all of these in turn related to the mystery of LIFE and EVOLUTION, etc., I tend to conclude that the Absolute Ultimate must be LIFE and its living power which points to SPIRIT, the Holy Spirit, to ATEN.
Segundo ( Teilhard de Chardin and confusely Gardner) speaks of NEGENTROPY and of a parallel dimension in which we already exist as negentropy ( the glorious body of St.Paul ) but this suffices for now.
So my invocation may be-:
In the name of ATEN,
LIFE ETERNAL, LIVING POWER,
SOURCE OF ALL POWER-FORMS,
Yahweh CREATOR,
Jesus Christ WORD and MEDIATOR.
So it is.
I believe Islam and Jews if good-willing, could easily accept this invocation.
Else may they all go to fuel next sidereal, solar processes as pure manure.
My synthesis of the above information is meant to be held as a flowing and plastic one and not cristallised into new Credos, causing us to jettison all previous elaborations, by well-meaning thinkers who did not have our informations from and technological views of the modern world, also benefiting
as we are from our observation of the dismal failures of religions/ideologies such as Islam ( Islam can be accepted only if it separates itself from its ideological distortions of truth and justice ).
The following elaboration from J.L.Segundo can also apply to Islam in so far as the distortion of justice and infra-human relations resulting from religious ideologies are concerned.
...................................................................................
The overt importance given to external ritual and signs by Roman Catholicism and other Religions can be compared to the overt reliance of the Pharisees on the outward observance of the Law. See Juan Luis Segundo S.J.’s volume III, ‘The Humanist Christology of Paul ” of the five volumes series “ Jesus of Nazareth Yesterday and Today ”.
Let me quote briefly from pages 26,27-:
................................As a synonym for the creaturely condition, therefore, the term ‘flesh’ [i.e., the human being’s awareness of its creaturely condition] could have either a negative or positive meaning. It was negative when it turned into an element of secularisation, positive when it became an element of religiosity.
When we look at the term in the letters to the Galatians and Corinthians, however, we are surprised to find that it seems to refer to an excess of religiosity. We are forced to conclude that the human being’s deep awareness of its creaturely condition leads it to place religion above itself, to use the religious realm as an intermediary between the intangible transcendenton the one hand and the insecurity of its condition as a creature on the other. The creature tries to lay hold of the transcendent and use it for human purposes. For Paul, then, the term ‘Flesh’ means just the opposite of a tendency to secularisation.
It was Jesus’ criticism of the religion of the Pharisees that enabled Paul, an ex-Pharisee, to effect this revolution in the terminology of the Old Testament. Flesh now signifies that the creature is afraid to confront God with criteria ( ontological and epistemological premises )deriving from the human being.
Thus it is opposed to an authentically religious faith, seeking to use the religious realm ideologically and placing that realm under the enslavement ( and the mechnisms ) of Sin [ a compromise with injustice with a deterioration of human relations ].
It is important that we discover what this mechanism concertely comprises for human existence. Otherwise its anthropological antidote, Faith, as used in Paul’s text, will come across to us as a merely magical element [the ancient dictum of Martin Luther: sola fides ] with supernatural efficacy and without any connection to a transformation of the whole human being.
.............................................................................................
Unquote from Juan Luis Segundo S.J.]
FINIS.

48. Both Jesus and Yahweh are elohim.

Both Jesus and Yahweh are elohim ( i.e., Genesis 1:2 ).
I think I have been making some discoveries about the Trinity as at present there is something not quite right about it all.
What I am saying does not change anything except tha it re-organises the whole thing making it more meaningful and rational, perhaps even acceptable to our obdurate, self-deluded, sisters/brethrens of the Judaic and Islamic faiths.
Until now, as the result of the conditioning of the Christian Churches to considering the Earth as the centre of the Universe, which is still lingering there with us due to the revulsion of the Priesthood to deal with their fossil-dogmas, Yahweh has acquired and maintained a central position in our minds, whereas the Holy Spirit should. This is not an issue about predominance or subordination, but of theological correctness.
In fact, once one begins with the Holy Spirit, rationally, in a recognition of the existence of a whole Universe out there, one has a chance to ask one's self where did Yahweh come from, since we, the Trinitarians at least, are also told about the existence of the Word, incarnated in Jesus of Nazareth.
Again Who is the Word, and how does IT relate to Spirit and Yahweh, etc.?
I am writing this final post ( the third on the subject ) on Blogger suggesting that the WORD, that is the HOLY SPIRIT acting in TIME, is, when in YAHWEH as a ELOHIM ( Genesis 1:2 ), the Creator or Executor of the Spirit's Plans for the world and human kind.
At present the Word is some being additional to Yahweh, the former having incarnated in Jesus of Nazareth. One cannot help feeling some redundancy somewhere, in need of rationalisation.
I claim the Word is in Yahweh as well as being the incarnation in Jesus of Nazareth, who therefore also acquires the status of ELOHIM.
I claim that the Word who is in Jesus of Nazareth, but who can act also freely away from Jesus, being everywhere, as well as Joseph are the fathers of Jesus, Joseph being the father of the man in Jesus.
I claim tha Jesus' status is that of the ELOHIM ( Genesis 1:2 ).
So-:
Holy Spirit
Word in Time
Word in Yahweh (elohim), creator and executor
Word in Jesus of Nazareth (elohim ), operative
Angels
Human beings
According to the Scriptures, some Angels were, at the beginnings, given extended powers as agents of the Word, becoming elohim. As such these could biologically and genetically manipulate and operate on human beings in the course of human evolution.
Genesis narrates about the temptation some Angels of elohim- status had to mix sexually with human females. The offspring would not of course inherit the elohim status that could only be given and taken away by the Word.
Some of the biological manipulations were carried out in disagreement with the Word's Plan or commands and the consequences of those interferences are still with human kind, today.
Genesis hints at the occurrence in those times of events even more devastating and obscene than those related to the various genetical-cleansing-operations perpetrated by various peoples in our own times.
Holocaust was not invented by the German Nazi.
It has occurred in the area of the Fertile Crescent thousands of years ago.

An Analogical explanation of my Rationale.
Modern Physics, after the days of Newton has given us categories to make order in relation to and distinguish between the concepts of POWER, WORK/ENERGY ( i.e., Power over Time), FORCE.
These terms are related to both animate and inanimate substances and can analogically be applied in relation to the divine beings of Theology.
If the HOLY SPIRIT is analogically considered to be the Power/Life of the Universe, there is obviously a semantic need of an agent called the WORD or Work that creates in TIME, over time. In fact, if Physics, which is under the laws of the Word as Creator of all, can be explained by such categories, so can the heavenly beings or divine substances benefit from the use of these categories in an analogical way.
After all, analogy was very much resorted to by the great Thomas Aquinas.
Now, all the Church Fathers speak about the Word as having been generated since times immemorial, however in Time.
To carry out the analogy a bit further, WORK/ENERGY results in a FORCE acting over space, lifting or shifting, or whatever, even at the invisible levels of micro-universe where small particles are operated upon.
So, logically, my dear Hebrews and Islamists one needs an operative.
A FORCE by itself is a static and dead thing, without the various universal motions occurring out there in the vastity of space.
And all this requires POWER IN TIME, i.e., the WORD and the elohim called Jesus Christ.

A classical example is the Force of Gravity that can only exist as the result of rotations, fields of forces, etc.
Angels, Human Beings, and beings in general are the anlogical counterpart of FORCES. By themselves these can do " buggerall " as these have no POWER.

Notwithstanding all this, the Hebrews doggedly stop at Yahweh of whom they claim they even lost the name, and the Islamists, equally doggedly stop at Allah or HOLY SPIRIT, the timeless. One cannot understand how this timeless being can feel mercy and compassion, outside time or without a human heart.
No wonder Hebrews and Arabs have been killing one-another since times immemorial!
Wake up you grongos!
If I were the UN I would give the whole Middle East 12 months to sort out their problems, to stop wasting depleting resources, else I would take away all their sovereigneties, granted them by the West since 1919 on the ground of their being unworthy of independence. So be it!

FINIS.


P.S.: I am not a supporter of Scientology.org

47. Letter to Timotheus

I have in the meanwhile reworked the Trinitarian Credo, placing the Holy Spirit at the beginning and realized the Word has become after all associated to or otherwise somehow incarnated in the Judaic Yahweh, as an elohim as well as similarly in Jesus of Nazareth ( in this case an incarnation) as an elohim also. That is why both Yahweh and Jesus can be said to be Sons of the Spirit, all being God in a Trinitarian Association with the Spirit which is the origin of all Life and Power in the Universe. Nothing changes really, but there is more understanding and rationality about it all, modestly/humbly speaking of course.:):):)
At present, we begin with the Father Yahweh when the original father/anscestor is the Spirit. Genesis 1:2 states ruah elohim..............the breath ( life ) of the gods went-back-and-forth over the watery expanse, after the initial Creation of the Heavens and the Earth. That was the Holy Spirit, or better the Word which is The-Spirit-after-time-began or The-Spirit-at-Work, as the originating power of all Creation, to be continued in various, future associations with the elohim, at various levels of power and tenure of the shared privileges. I am afraid that, from a human perspective one cannot avoid subordinating the elohim to the Spirit, but at the divine level their association is so perfect that subordination disappears or simply becomes sin as in Satan when becoming conscious and a temptation for rebellion or disobeyance. There is no need to change our trinitarian prayers as Yahweh ( the Word in IT ) is still Father and Creator, particularly as maker ( no generation here ) of human-kind.
The Word is the only being generated by the Spirit as Working-Spirit ( i.e.,..........in time).
The only change is that Jesus is both the Son of the Spirit ( the Scriptures say-: Conceived by the Holy Spirit ) as the Word, and the son of Joseph as a human being.
We always forget in fact that Creation has not ended but is ongoing, as we are waiting for a New Earth. It might have ended with the Sabbath for the Jews of the Old Testament but, maybe Yahweh began creating again with the New Testament. One must admit the World changed at a rapid increasing speed after the coming of Jesus. Therefore, in the case of Jesus, as an elohim, being conceived and born became the joint generation/work of both the Word and Joseph as a human agent. We are all agents of God somehow, that we like it or not even when sinning.:):):):)

46. Evolutionary and Biblical Adam.

Evolutionary and Biblical Adam.
My ancient theological class-mate, lady Guenevieve has accused me to be an outrageous manic obsessive because of my tamperings with Moses , the Trinitarian/Catholic Credo, the order of presentation of the three persons of the Holy Trinity, etc., on the strength of Gardner. I wish I had the energy to check on Gardner, on Moses and Akhenaten but I feel Gardner may be correct as there is a gap of 800 years [ Emmanuel Velikovsky ] in the Egyptian chronology everyone outside the academic Circles accepts as being correct. Moreover, Horemheb the last of the dynasty, after Tutankhamon ( whose tomb was discovered accidentally ) erased all the names and references to the 18th dynasty in hatred of ATEN, the imageless, hidden God of Akhenaten. However, except for introducing some inevitable subordination, my normalisations do not really affect or change trinitarian belief/faith/prayers.
Subordination appears to be there even if un-intentional, since we, as human beings cannot make three names/objects/statements coincide into one on paper, and one must admit, even in our hearts and minds, due to our being human and naturally split-minded ( Koestler), and have to be graphically sequential
(i.e., something has to come first either in speech or paper even on computer programs with their sequential windows).
What follows shall suggest the existence of two Adams-:
One I shall call the Genetic/DNA/Evolutionary Adam who lived about 65,000 years ago on the northern shores of Lake Victoria
( Africa) and might have been a black man ( even Moses/Akhenaten was half coloured, someone looking like Michael Jackson, or better still, graceful Obama, no offence meant of course to either one of the four:):):):):):) ), and there are people in Sicily I know of, and elsewhere I am sure, belonging to the "A"-Y-DNA haplogroup of original Adam, the other, the Biblical Adam that even Gardner agrees lived in Mesopotamia in about 6,000 BC.
Evolutionary Adam, I am sorry to delude our proud, arrogant chauvinistic human believers in a special direct Creation, an attitude deriving from the ancienr error/(a sin in some criminals among us even today) of considering the earth and human beings as the centre of the whole Universe, evolved like all other life-forms, from the BIOLOGICAL CELL, perhaps with some kicks by the WORD now and then to correct Plan, Chance, Fate and Entropy, ( read Juan Luis Segundo S.J. " An Evolutionary Approach to Jesus Christ", volume V of the five volumes set "Jesus of Nazareth Yesterday and Today", publisher: Maryknoll, N.Y.).
The human being emerged as an Homo ( no not an homosexual you nitwits!) about one million years ago + or - half a million years. The Biblical Adam is the one who, probably belonging to a Y-DNA haplogroup K, I , J, or E ( believe it or not, I belong to the ' E ' and I know of a sicilian person of the same surname of the 'J' haplogroup )............ himself a descendent from the Genetic/Evolutionary Adam ( 'A' haplogroup ), became further genetically manipulated by the elohim ( the Fallen Angels of Genesis which uses ' to make/manufacture/manipulate' in relation to the making of humankind from the earth's substances/materials by the elohim), the most powerful of whom and the one having permanent divine tenure of an association with the WORD ( Holy Spirit in action, in time) being called Yahweh ( Gardner calls IT Enlil Jehovah and does not like IT).
Yehwah, (Yahweh, Jehovah etc.) is a Father of humankind having made a special people of genetically modified human beings.
Both Jews and Arabs claim they are this special people but I doubt it as they have ben blood-letting since time immemorial, still doing so, supporting Gardner's suspicion and mine too, that the Scriptures have been somehow manipulated by the Hebrews in opposition to the Mosaic Israelites who believed in ATEN.
Where/when/how did the WORD find this special being, Yahweh, to associate ITSELF to ( no gender as the WORD is a pure spirit in spite of the feminists' belief to the contrary, naming the WORD Sophia) ?.
As Jesus was a human descendent of David, Yahweh may have similarly been a specially gifted and endowed person, chosen by the WORD, an anscestor of David, living perhaps in 50,000- 35,000 BC at the times of the appearance on earth of the mysterious Cro-Magnon ( 'R ' haplogroup) and the sad, tragic extinction of the Neanderthals, prior to the mesopotamian events of " Making/Genetic Manipulation " resulting in Homo Adamiticus Sapiens Sapiens around 6,000 BC. Also, there must have occurred, between 50,000 and 35,000 BC a widespread, dreary 'holocaust ' of the race of hominids from Africa as the result of wrong manipulations and miscegenations perpetrated by some low-level elohim ( the fore-runners of later ethnic/racial/religious/whatsoever reason, 'cleansers '). Even the Nazis were 'tender babies ' in comparison to those primordial elohim, not the fault of the WORD at all, who made free beings subjected to Chance, Fate, and Entropy ( Scarcity and Necessity ), of the fact therefore that Homo was not yet ready and a faulty version/mark, i.e., in need of some extra genetic manipulations, which were to reveal themselves also not sufficient, requiring the coming of Jesus in 0 AD and a second coming of Jesus, to make a New Earth, sometime in the future ( no, no, all Catholic impetrations and liturgies and sacraments, no, no, Islam or Judaism cannot give us a Kingdom of God made by human beings). The scriptural myth of a world created perfect is just a dream that begs the question: WHY a Fall? that has no scriptural answer. Even the WORD's Creations are commensurate to the WORD's Infinite Power and therefore subjected to the Plan that includes the possibility, if not the necessity of further re-creations ( Thomas Aquinas & all did not like the word necessity associated with God, however, if God so decided to limit God who are we to object?) . This is why Yahweh became then necessary and could not be an easy-going democratic God a " la Obama ". Who knows wether perhaps even Obama might be a minor elohim, a fore-runner of Jesus' second coming ( yes I am being sarcastic and ironic too )?
So, there are people on earth who should have an edge over the others ( for good or bad halas ), the latter not having benefited from special experiences or events. However, thanks to globalisation and escalating fornications, these benefits should very soon reach a vast majority of human kind. However, as already pointed out, these benefits can also work for evil in some of us, and the truth remains that with the coming of Jesus ( ca. 2009 years ago, remember?), genetic modifications for good can occur directly, by the Holy Spirit coming into us through Jesus. This is what St.Paul writes about in Romans in reference to the body of glory.
Yes indeed, we can all now, today, tomorrow, including our adorable, enchanting ( forgive me Yahweh my weackness for females) beloved females ( including Guenevieve), become elohim!
This is the power and beauty of being a Christian!
This is a stage when one can be called a Racist as the Democratic Constitutions assure us we are absolutely all equal. I am glad I read Gardner who, although confused and unable to synthetise, supplies information which, right or wrong makes one speculate.
His information must be correct, although he appears to be confused by it, poor fellow, not being a Theologian such as I am, trained by the cunning and mighty Jesuits of Royal Parade-Parkville-Melbourne, as he is only the Guardian of the Templar-Information and Tradition and does not have to necessarily understand it or synthetise it.
In a way, this is what has happened with the Scriptures which even those who wrote these may not necessarily have understood what they wrote at the time they wrote what they wrote:):):):):).
Bloody awful feeling? Yes.
Please let me remind you Sir Laurence Gardner, a noble Scot, with a Templar Pedigree, is a Quantum Physicist, the Head of the Celtic Church ( in hiding), the Master of Scottish Templars
( in hiding ), the Representative of the Stewarts, the Heirs to the Scottish Crown ( in hiding ). Gardner is also the Holder of all Templar Secrets, Traditions, History, and most importantly, the Templar's Treasures.
Now, with these credentials he cannot be that bad or misinformed, in spite of his not liking Yahweh whom he believes to be a cruel God.
The point is my dear sisters, brethrens, fellows, and readers, that neither the Holy Spirit nor Yahweh nor even sweet Jesus believe in Democracy or Father Christmass or even perhaps in Obama ( perhaps my Lady Guenevieve is right).
Check about Sir Laurence Gardner, the Y-DNA Haplogroups Testing, Juan Luis Segundo S.J., on Wikipaedia before concluding lady Guenevieve is right and of accusing me of having made all the above up through sheer imaginations.

PS: For those of you who may be interested in J.L.Segundo's mighty work in five volumes, here it is-:
"Jesus of Nazareth Yesterday and Today"
volume I: "Faith and Ideologies "
volume II; "The Historical Jesus of the Synoptics "
volume III: "The Humanist Christology of Paul "
volume IV: " The Christ of the Ignatian Exercises "
volume V: " An Evolutiobnary Approach to Jesus of Nazareth ".
Orbis Books-Maryknoll, N.Y, 1988.

I do not think you could buy these on E-Bay or look these up on Google's Library as they would bust their memories!

Please do not complain my articles are too long!

45. The Perfect Prayer of Recognition in Invocation.

The Perfect Prayer
of Recognition in Invocation.

In the name
of the Holy Spirit ,
of
oneness ,
unity
and
GENERATION ;
image-less ,
hidden ,
the ATEN ------:

Word ,
operative in CREATION ;

Yehwah ,
Father the MAKER ;

Jesus Nazarene ,
Son and Mediator .

Haem.

44. Father Kennedy-: A neo-Arian?

Dear Timotheus utahensis, greetings.
Our research in "gensferreria' is a good form of occupational therapy as it invites us to meditate on how our anscestors did survive even worse odds than the ones facing us to-day or that shall certainly face us tomorrow. That is why I love you Mormons being "past-conscious ".
Being Past-conscious is not snobbery, and we should become fully aware of this lack of snobbery, thus removing yet another possible cause of anxiety about possibly being snobs. We all have a problem induced by the bullshit claims of a Democracy gone mad. NO, WE ARE NOT ALL EQUAL ALTHOUGH AS CHRISTIANS WE NEED EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES ACCORDING TO GRACE AND CAPACITY. No, meditation and contemplation are not reserved to R.C. Monks, but belong to every Christian. Amen!
I have to write a Post about an Australian R.C. Priest called Father Peter Kennedy who has been finally been sacked by the ArchBishop for refusing to stop preaching Arianism. I, we all may have doubts about the Full Divinity of Jesus. My first tenet is that we Christian must not sacrifice our intrinsic UNITY for theological differences, especially when confronting modern world's globality and the resurgent power of Islam which is really, bottom-line Arianism.
I have been declared an EBIONITE when my Christology was examined for entrance to Master years ago. I do not mind and do not complain. It is a Badge to me. At least I am something more than an R.C. and a Christian apart from believing I am principally a chosen Melchezedekian.
One of my most favourite sayings of St. Paul is the one in Romans about the duty of a Christian once she/he may have begun believing in Jesus, to act daily in transforming 'the body of death' ( not of sin any longer as Jesus' resurrection removed the sting of sin from death) into 'the body of glory '. To me this is an up and down crescendo progression of failures and successes, but even finances/stock-exchange curves are so. It is natural and we are part of nature as well as of the divine. I believe God shall integrate the whole curve produced in my lifetime if you understand what I mean and allow for the entropy he allowed in Creation.
So, I too and you also............are all acting toward our personal body of glory, since/because we believe in Jesus.
Yet Jesus, even if he were to be considered in the Arian
( Moslem) way, as fully human only, and had he even had ritualistic relations with Mary Magdalene ( as the Catharists/Albigensians/Ebionites believed) for the sake of procreation and of the Sang Real in which we "gensferreria" and others of course may be sharing ( remember the promise of God to Abraham about the stars of firmament being as numerous as David's progeny), this does not have to mean Jesus was equal to any or even all of us and Democracy had not yet been adopted by the Gentiles or the Jews, in Jesus' time, as it is not even now, to-day God's Political Credo, as God is a Supreme Autocratic Absolute Ruler. Jesus of Nazareth, may in fact have benefited from a greater participation into the divine blessing of a Body of Glory in his own lifetime, greater than any human participation so far experienced by any human person who ever lived since Homo Adamiticus Sapiens Sapiens.
Perhaps in this sense ( in relation to the 'body of glory' ), one can remain a Roman Catholic or even a Moslem or an Arian and accept Jesus’ simultaneous full divinity and humanity.
I am a Bachelor of Theology and have written Essays in Christology for my entrance to Master, before being declared an Ebionite by some nitwit who still salivates and gloats on the Mystery so one can keep on writing more and more idiocies about it and keep on salivating and gloating until the Kingdom’s coming.
Since no one has yet been able to explain in an acceptable, rational human language the Mystery of the simultaneous FULL divinity and humanity of Jesus, it should be permissible to try to express possible solutions at less exalted, more useful levels of understanding, aimig to facilitate christian praxis ( i.e., the avoidance of blood-shedding ).
There are two possible major errors in this attempt, namely, either believing in a Jesus fully and only human, equal to everyone else in a democratic way, a glorified Angel, or believing principally and essentially in a Jesus fully and only divine, a human puppet. I am not going to enumerate and label all the possible errors laying in between these extremes, already made by theologians trying to solve the Mystery or Dogma through the ages of Church History.
I cannot see why participation in an act of procreation ( as practiced among the Essenes) should make Jesus less worthy of the ' body of glory ' of which St. Paul writes about, as being attainable by every practicing believer.
On the other hand, I wish to stress that modern democratic human kind may have gone far too far in their sexual/materialistic obsessions that are making human kind lower than animals. ( proof ot what I am saying are to be found in the general western toleration of pornography, distorted sexual practices and even BESTIALITY [ I have not heard Priests, Ministers or Pastors preach openly and constantly about these obscene practices which are worse than anything even practiced by the Pagans of Greece, Assyria or Babylon ].
This appears to go together with the modern resurgent preoccupations of some members of the Christian Churches who are seeking favour and popularity with the masses of guilt-ridden devotees seeking unattainable justification for their materialistic excesses, when wishing to focus on a Jesus fully and essentially only human. The error here is in forgetting to qualify Jesus’ unique and distinctive humanity in a non-democratic way, by stressing the rigorous self-discipline of Jesus as a member of an Essene community and the need for so called Christians to practice Christianity by renunciation rather than self-fulfilment beyond any reasonable call to moderation and the sacredness of sexual practices which should not be seen as the means to seek pleasure/satisfaction. The need to act in such a way daily to attain the Body of Glory which Jesus possessed in his lifetime, should be daily stressed. Sacramental props should remain props ad not subsituttes for actual action and behaviour. Sorry!
The overt importance given to external ritual and signs by Roman Catholicism and other Religions can be compared to the overt reliance of the Pharisees on the outward observance of the Law. See Juan Luis Segundo S.J.’s volume III, " The Humanist Christology of Paul ” of the five volumes series
“ Jesus of Nazareth Yesterday and Today ”.
Let me quote briefly from pages 26,27-:
................................As a synonym for the creaturely condition, therefore, the term ‘flesh’ [i.e., the human being’s awareness of its creaturely condition] could have either a negative or positive meaning. It was negative when it turned into an element of secularisation, positive when it became an element of religiosity.
When we look at the term in the letters to the Galatians and Corinthians, however, we are surprised to find that it seems to refer to an excess of religiosity. We are forced to conclude that the human being’s deep awareness of its creaturely condition leads it to place religion above itself, to use the religious realm as an intermediary between the intangible transcendenton the one hand and the insecurity of its condition as a creature on the other. The creature tries to lay hold of the transcendent and use it for human purposes. For Paul, then, the term ‘Flesh’ means just the opposite of a tendency to secularisation.
It was Jesus’ criticism of the religion of the Pharisees that enabled Paul, an ex-Pharisee, to effect this revolution in the terminology of the Old Testament. Flesh now signifies that the creature is afraid to confront God with criteria ( ontological and epistemological premises )deriving from the human being.
Thus it is opposed to an authentically religious faith, seeking to use the religious realm ideologically and placing that realm under the enslavement ( and the mechnisms ) of Sin [ a compromise with injustice with a deterioration of human relations ].
It is important that we discover what this mechanism concertely comprises for human existence. Otherwise its anthropological antidote, Faith, as used in Paul’s text, will come across to us as a merely magical element [the ancient dictum of Martin Luther: sola fides ] with supernatural efficacy and without any connection to a transformation of the whole human being.
.............................................................................................
Unquote from Juan Luis Segundo S.J.]

So, in order to maintain this required tension toward the Body of Glory in all Members of the Christian Churches, and combat Arianism and Islamism, I believe that it is wiser to preach a Mystery of the Full Divinity and Humanity of Jesus on the ground that no one really knows the exact extent of Jesus’ sharing of or participating in the two realities/beings.
So, although Father Kennedy may have been well meaning, he has choosen the wrong approach and strategy about this issue for our present times which are global and as dangerous to Christianity and Western Unity as those that occurred during the Middle Ages and the Renaissance due to the problem of a resurging Islam and rampant Materialism. I fail him as a theologian and advise him to go back and study theology again, and especially History, if he really has or has ever had a capacity for these subjects.